I ran Anthropic's 335-page IPO filing through an AI-writing detector. Well, well, well…
Source: Business Insider ·
Is it bad if Anthropic didn't rely heavily on Claude to write its IPO paperwork — or is this an example of when the stakes are too high to rely on AI?
From the source
Anthropic's mostly human SEC filing, according to Pangram.Pangram / Busin ess InsiderI set out to see if Anthropic used Claude to draft its S-1 paperwork.The filing is, according to the AI detector tool Pangram, 92% human-written.Is that a good or bad thing? I'm not even sure!Anthropic's much-awaited S-1 filing landed today, revealing all sorts of interesting things about the company's plans and current finances.But the biggest question I had wasn't "does Anthropic think that accidentally destroying humanity is a business risk?" (yes) or "how much money are they losing?" (lots) or "does it feel weird to be part of the 50% of employees who don't do the pledge to donate some of their equity for the greater good?" (still wondering — if this is you, let me know).My question was: Did they use AI to write this thing?To find out, I ran the whole 335-page S-1 filing through Pangram, a service that checks for signs of AI-writing. Ok, well technically I tried to run it through myself, but ran…